Freedom and Justice Party

Tue, April 10, 2012 Egyptian Court Blocks Islamist Constitution, Obama Quietly Releases Aid

by Meira Svirsky

An Egyptian court has blocked the newly elected parliament legitimacy to make a new constitution for Egypt. The Cairo administrative court "halts the implementation of the decision by the parliament's speaker to form the constitutional assembly to draft the constitution," Judge Ali Fekri told the court.

The decision is seen as a way to block the Islamists, who now have a parliamentary majority, from writing a constitution that will make sharia the legal law of Egypt.  The decision comes on the coattails of the Muslim Brotherhood's Freedom and Justice Party's annoucement that they will field a candidate for the upcoming presidential elections. The party, who now dominates the parliment, had previosuly promised not to field a candidate due to pressure not too appear as a dominant Islamic force in the country.

The Brotherhood's candidate, Khairat al-Shater, right, recently made the surprise announcement that instituting sharia in Egypt is his "first and final" goal for the country. The announcement came as the party's members, purporting to be the moderate force of Egypt, were being feted in Washington, D.C. by government officials and the pretigious Georgetown University.

Despite the fact that the Brotherhood is the parent organization of Hamas, a U.S.-designated illegal terorrist entity, the Obama administration has made a decision to engage the Brotherhood in an effort to block what they perceive as the more radical Salafist Islamic party in Egypt. The Salafist's gained a significant amount of seats in the recent parliamentary elections and has feted an enormously popular candidate for the presidency, Hazem Salah Abu Ismail.

The U.S. administration has also quietly just released $1.5 billion in aid to the new Egyptian govenment, evevn though in October of 2010, on the eve of the Egyptian revolution, the Supreme Guide of the Muslim Brotherhood called for jihad against the United States.

Mon, April 2, 2012 Muslim Brotherhood's 'Perception Management Team' to Washington, D.C.

by: 
Clare Lopez

A Muslim Brotherhood perception management team is coming to Washington, D.C. Georgetown University's Saudi-funded Alwaleed Bin Talal Center for Muslim-Christian Understanding and its Director, John Esposito, will host a delegation of Egyptian members of the Brotherhood’s Freedom and Justice Party for “a discussion” on April 4, 2012.

Then, the group will join fellow Brotherhood-affiliates from Jordan, Libya, Morocco and Tunisia the next day at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace for a program to be moderated by Nathan Brown, Professor of Political Science and International Affairs at George Washington University and a senior associate in the Middle East Program at Carnegie.

Professor John Esposito founded the Georgetown Center that now bears the name of the Saudi royal prince whose $20 million dollar endowment in 2005 bought a devoted pro-Islamic program at this Catholic university in the nation’s capital. Professor Nathan Brown, another apologist for sharia Islam, testified for the defense in the first Holy Land Foundation HAMAS terror funding trial, in which he attempted to whitewash the obligatory Islamic annual zakat tax, a portion of which according to sharia (Islamic law) must go to jihad.

Among the Egyptian Brothers welcomed to Washington by Esposito and Brown will be Abdul Mawgoud Dardery, left, a Freedom and Justice Party Member of Parliament from Luxor and a member of the party’s Foreign Relations Committee; Hussein El-Kazzaz, a businessman and advisor to the Freedom and Justice Party; a “Sister,” Sondos Asem, Senior Editor at the Brotherhood’s online website, www.Ikhwanweb.com and a member of the party’s Foreign Relations Committee; and Khaled Al-Qazzaz, the Foreign Relations Coordinator for the Freedom and Justice Party. 

After predictably sweeping some 75% of the parliamentary vote together with fellow supporters of Islamic law in the Salafist party, the Muslim Brotherhood already is beginning to clamp down on dissent from the majority, pro-sharia line.

Speaking in February 2012, Abdul Mawgoud Dardery expressed disapproval for any “type of democracy that will not bring Islamists to power…this is wrong,” he said. In this sense, it would appear that Dardery considers “democracy” a kind of mob rule in which the majority makes the rules—and the majority in Egypt today is unquestionably pro Muslim Brotherhood and pro Islamic Law.

Despite an Election Program that is liberally studded with words like “freedom,” “justice” and “equality” that would make Thomas Jefferson proud, in practice, the Freedom and Justice Party is unlikely to stray far from sharia once firmly empowered by the new Egyptian constitution it will have the lead role in writing.

The brazen misrepresentation of sharia in this election year document (aka taqiyya) should be "Exhibit A" for any who still think this revolution was about American-style democracy. Currently published as part of the Freedom and Justice Party platform, whoppers like the following won’t be around for long after June 2012:

  • “…freedom of belief and worship are rights guaranteed by the Constitution and the law, and by sharia (Islamic law)…” [“Whoever changes his religion, kill him,” said the Muslim prophet Muhammad, according to authoritative ahadith. If anyone still harbors the illusion that this commandment is irrelevant in the 21st century, the story of the Iranian Christian Pastor Youcef Nadarkhani, who has been imprisoned, charged and reportedly sentenced to death on faith-based charges variously described as apostasy or insult to Islam, should be illustrative.]
  • “…our fellow Christians must not be deprived of the right to build churches” [The 9th century Pact of Umar, whose provisions are included in the book of Islamic Law called “The Reliance of the Traveller” (or ‘Umdat al-Salik) which bears the 1991 imprimatur of Al-Azhar University in Cairo, Egypt, says that “…we will not erect in our city or the suburbs any new monastery, church, cell or hermitage; that we will not repair any of such buildings that may fall into ruins, or renew those that may be situated in the Muslim quarters of the town…” The laws governing the Ahl al-dhimma, or conquered People of the Book, state that failure to keep any part of this Pact by Christians or Jews results in automatic abrogation of the Pact and immediate forfeiture of their right to life, liberty and property. In other words, their blood becomes haram (permitted)—and for the beleaguered Coptic community across much of Egypt already has.]
  • “The basic principle of Islamic law is equality between women and men…” [Qur’an Sura 4:34 says, “Men are the protectors and maintainers of women, because Allah has given the one more (strength) than the other, and because they support them from their means. Therefore the righteous women are devoutly obedient, and guard in (the husband's) absence what Allah would have them guard. As to those women on whose part ye fear disloyalty and ill-conduct, admonish them (first), (Next), refuse to share their beds, (And last) beat them…”]

And finally, among the Ikhwan delegation is the lone “Sister,” Sondos Asem, (left) who is senior editor at the Brotherhood’s online website, www.Ikhwanweb.com and a member of the Party’s Foreign Relations Committee. Asem, it will be recalled, was the young 20-something who so beguiled Nicholas Kristoff, (left), during his December 2011 interview with her for the New York Times.

Apparently completely bamboozled by this articulate, well-educated mouthpiece for the Egyptian Brotherhood, the oddly naive Kristoff swallowed whole her absurd pronouncements about the equal position of women in the organization and Muslim society. The fact that, in the NYT video of the interview, Asem and her mother both wore typical Islamic garb with their heads tightly swathed while Asem’s brother, obviously the dominant figure in the family, lingered out of sight off-camera as Asem laughingly told Kristoff she “can’t talk in front of him,” seemed not to register with him in the slightest. 

This is the Ikhwan’s traveling perception management team, then, that is now headed for the U.S. Its purpose, in advance of the new constitution that the Brotherhood will be writing for Egypt in coming months, is to soothe American concerns over the coming transformation of the Egyptian government from a military dictatorship with Islamic undertones to a frankly Islamic one.

Of course, they’d like to keep the U.S. largesse flowing for as long as possible and once U.S. citizens begin to glom onto the Brotherhood’s anti-Western, anti-Christian, anti-Israel sharia agenda, that might not be so easy. The Muslim Brotherhood motto doesn’t come across so well once people know what’s in it:

Allah is our objective, Muhammad is our Prophet, the Quran is our law, Jihad is our way, and dying in the way of Allah is our highest aspiration.

They might start thinking about what the Muslim Brotherhood logo, (left), means, too: the Arabic word at the bottom of the circle is waidu, meaning “prepare,” and comes from the first word of Qur’anic verse 8:60, which tells Muslims to “Make ready your strength to the utmost of your power, including steeds of war, to strike terror into the hearts of the enemy.”                                                 

If it is possible to attend these sessions at Georgetown University or Carnegie, it is sure to be instructive in the methodology of the influence operation. The words will be perfectly calibrated to resonate with freedom-loving people who cheer to see the oppressed rise up chanting slogans about “democracy.” The reality is otherwise…but because the Brotherhood’s influence within America’s own national security leadership circles, academia, and society as a whole already is so great, it can be difficult to realize that the pre-violent jihad by stealth is far more lethal to the West than the violent jihad. The violence will come anyway (at the end), but now is the time for “civilization jihad,” unless delegations like this one are seen for what they really are and met with some pointed questions.  

Clare Lopez is a senior fellow at the Clarion Fund and a strategic policy and intelligence expert with a focus on the Middle East, national defense and counterterrorism. Lopez began her career as an operations officer with the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA).

See also RadicalIslam.org's related article America Rolls Out Welcome Mat for Hamas and Muslim Brotherhood.

Mon, April 2, 2012 America Rolls Out Welcome Mat for Hamas and Muslim Brotherhood

Despite the fact that Hamas is an illegal terrorist entity since 1995 in the United States, the parent organization of Hamas, the Muslim Brotherhood, has been invited to one of American’s top universities.

On April 4, an official delegation of the Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood and its Freedom and Justice Party – a major winner in Egypt’s recent parliamentary election -- will be visiting Georgetown University in Washington, D.C. The delegation comes at the behest of the Saudi-funded Alwaleed Bin Talal Center for Muslim-Christian Understanding.

Providing aid to Hamas in America is a crime punishable by a long-term prison sentence prison sentence, as was the case with the perpetrators of the Holy Land Terror Funding Trial.

The delegation is expected to meet with U.S. government officials as well.

Georgetown, who had originally sent out an invitation with the Muslim Brotherhood’s name on it, changed the text and sent out a new version when they realized their error however the change was strictly cosmetic, as there is no functional or philosophical difference between the Brotherhood and its political party.

Hamas has openly declared that it is "a branch of the Muslim Brotherhood – Palestine," and in fact was created as a Brotherhood offshoot.

In a well-researched article, Investigative Project for Terrorism reports that just like the Muslim Brotherhood, the Freedom and Justice Party says one thing in English and another in Arabic. It has learned to mouth politically correct platitudes to Westerners, while saving its true ideological diatribes for Egyptians.

According to the party’s website last summer, as articulated by FJP member Abdul Muti Zaki, the party advocates "fostering the spirit of jihad in the nation" through a nationwide program of conscription and ideological indoctrination. Specifically, the party calls for “linking jihad to the ideology that the nation believes in and lives for, and in whose way death is pleasantness… The doctrine of our nation is Islam. Therefore it has only succeeded in its history by jihad 'in the way of Allah.' The messenger of Allah explained the meaning of 'in the way of Allah' saying, 'He who fights that the word of Allah be supreme, he is in the way of Allah.'

The Investigative Project on Terrorism also reports that the party’s 2011 election platform also embraced anti-Western terrorism, referring to it as "resistance," particularly against America and Israel. The chairman of the party said on Feb. 29, "I want an office of the Palestinian resistance movement Hamas to be opened in Cairo and I would very much welcome it."

The FJP's website also ran an article by the party's secretary Mohamad Katatni preaching violence against Jews at a demonstration last August.

At the demonstration, the crowd roared chants of "Khaybar, Khaybar, oh Jew, the army of Muhammad is right here," and "Patience, patience, Jews. The Egyptians will dig your grave."

Katatni told the demonstrators, "The Egyptian revolution represents the beginning of the end of the Zionist entity, stressing that the strength of Islam is only one capable of eliminating the Zionist entity and liberating Palestine." Where the Jews had defeated the Arabs time and again in pre-Islamic times, he claimed, Islam provided a new strength. "The Arabs were only able to defeat them after Islam came, and the Arabs and Muslims began to confront the Jews with the strength of faith," he told the crowd.

More information can be found by clicking InvestigativeProject.org

Syndicate content